Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Date: 2021-11-20 06:20:24
Message-ID: CALj2ACWuC6t7uudfuZpQbwZDe9H9M4mF5nhCq7xC2+BCOSpdDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 4:07 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The Attached v15 patch has the fixes for the same.

Thanks. The v15 patch LGTM and the cf bot is happy hence marking it as RfC.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-11-20 06:25:16 Re: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-11-20 06:16:35 Re: pg_waldump stucks with options --follow or -f and --stats or -z