From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, sergey(dot)dudoladov(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Is there a way (except from server logs) to know the kind of on-going/last checkpoint? |
Date: | 2022-01-28 03:28:17 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACWjxZ9357QJgFpubLgZGrB2CbiTGRyE-jFQFB7rSqDHNA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 8:54 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 08:17:39AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> >
> > Thanks all for the comments. pg_stat_progress_checkpoint is being
> > discussed in another thread [1].
> >
> > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACV-F%2BK%2Bz%2BXW8fnK4MV71qz2gzAMxFnYziRgZURMB5ycAQ%40mail.gmail.com
>
> This thread was explicitly talking about log reporting and it's not clear to me
> that it's now supposed to be about a new pg_stat_progress_checkpoint()
> function. I think you should start a new thread or at least change the subject
> to be clearer.
+1 to change the subject of that thread to 'report checkpoint progress
with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint'.
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-01-28 04:22:25 | Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init |
Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-01-28 03:26:34 | RE: row filtering for logical replication |