| From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix a wal_debug crash with the new shmem allocation API |
| Date: | 2026-10-08 18:53:03 |
| Message-ID: | CALj2ACWUzOmgTHQ++eBkZSczH=v4LMOBXHPOXvMwbtpAL5NuuQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 8, 2026 at 3:07 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>
> Hmm, it's a bit ugly to initialize what is a purely backend-private
> thing in the ShmemInit/Attach() functions. It was expedient in the past,
> because the ShmemInit() functions happened to run at the right times,
> but initializing the memory context was never related to shared memory
> in any way. I propose the attached, which calls the InitWalDebug()
> function from InitXLogInsert() instead.
Thanks. Yes, this fix is better than mine. Since the wal_debug memory
context is only used while inserting WAL records, moving it to the WAL
insert working buffers initialization code is correct. The patch LGTM.
> Searching for similar cases where we do backend-private initialization
> that is not related to shared memory in the shmem callbacks, I found
> BufferManagerShmemAttach():
>
> > static void
> > BufferManagerShmemAttach(void *arg)
> > {
> > /* Initialize per-backend file flush context */
> > WritebackContextInit(&BackendWritebackContext,
> > &backend_flush_after);
> > }
>
> There's no bug here, but I propose that we also move that to
> InitBufferManagerAccess(), per the second attached patch.
Moving the per-backend file flush context to the buffer pool access
init function looks good to me. Do we need to keep
BackendWritebackContext as extern? A quick check on
https://sourcegraph.com says no, but just in case any external module
needs it.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2026-10-08 18:53:17 | Re: Do we want to solve reload/config races more generally? (was: Postmaster crashes on SIGHUP when oauth_validator_libraries holds only whitespace) |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2026-10-08 18:30:25 | Re: Parallel vacuum: I/O timings in the log leave out the parallel workers |