From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is Recovery actually paused? |
Date: | 2021-02-07 13:14:31 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACWEcqnKWgrUKw8VOPBkCHs0TjRDTDemda-rmHLr_gBD3Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 10:14 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > We can not do that, basically, under one lock we need to check the
> > state and set it to pause. Because by the time you release the lock
> > someone might set it to RECOVERY_NOT_PAUSED then you don't want to set
> > it to RECOVERY_PAUSED.
>
> Got it. Thanks.
Hi Dilip, I have one more question:
+ /* test for recovery pause, if user has requested the pause */
+ if (((volatile XLogCtlData *) XLogCtl)->recoveryPauseState ==
+ RECOVERY_PAUSE_REQUESTED)
+ recoveryPausesHere(false);
+
+ now = GetCurrentTimestamp();
+
Do we need now = GetCurrentTimestamp(); here? Because, I see that
whenever the variable now is used within the for loop in
WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable, it's re-calculated anyways. It's being
used within case XLOG_FROM_STREAM:
Am I missing something?
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-02-07 13:57:02 | Re: Is Recovery actually paused? |
Previous Message | Kazutaka Onishi | 2021-02-07 12:36:13 | Re: TRUNCATE on foreign table |