Re: Misplaced superuser check in pg_log_backend_memory_contexts()

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Misplaced superuser check in pg_log_backend_memory_contexts()
Date: 2021-06-06 13:33:46
Message-ID: CALj2ACWA2xYpZp3qCSTEcxbu6y9_V9_1hY3YZpS5rrzHoVgVDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:23 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> While reading the code of pg_log_backend_memory_contexts(), I have
> been surprised to see that the code would attempt to look at a PROC
> entry based on the given input PID *before* checking if the function
> has been called by a superuser. This does not strike me as a good
> idea as this allows any users to call this function and to take
> ProcArrayLock in shared mode, freely.
>
> It seems to me that we had better check for a superuser at the
> beginning of the function, like in the attached.

pg_signal_backend still locks ProcArrayLock in shared mode first and then
checks for the superuser permissions. Of course, it does that for the
roleId i.e. superuser_arg(proc->roleId), but there's also superuser() check.

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Omar Kilani 2021-06-06 13:41:52 Re: Strangeness with UNIQUE indexes and UTF-8
Previous Message David Rowley 2021-06-06 11:59:39 Re: Strangeness with UNIQUE indexes and UTF-8