| From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com, shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: enhance wraparound warnings |
| Date: | 2026-08-04 15:55:11 |
| Message-ID: | CALj2ACW6m2r40TW1sAZjVDP40NKbESLyUP6jRvMNGLAJtgpq9A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 1:41 AM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Just a quick question: is the documentation change considered
> > backpatchable when the source commit exists in older versions? I mean,
> > does it fall into the bug or inconsistency category that qualifies for
> > backpatching?
>
> Yes, I think 0002 is backpatchable. The issue is minor, but the documentation
> example is clearly inconsistent with the actual runtime message in branches
> where the source commit was backpatched. So I see this as a documentation
> bug fix rather than a cosmetic wording change.
Sounds good to me. Thanks for clarifying.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2026-08-04 16:54:12 | Re: doc: clarify wal_sender_shutdown_timeout behavior for small values |
| Previous Message | Kirk Roybal | 2026-08-04 15:49:43 | Re: [PATCH] Add PROMPT_COMMAND and dynamic prompt support to psql |