Re: libpq: PQgetCopyData() and allocation overhead

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeroen Vermeulen <jtvjtv(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq: PQgetCopyData() and allocation overhead
Date: 2023-02-27 13:48:14
Message-ID: CALj2ACVaBEbFnBwJ44Uuy7xwr50M+wwTJoEz0C9dFOc=iZeTDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 5:49 PM Jeroen Vermeulen <jtvjtv(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> OK, I've updated the PR with a benchmark (in the main directory).
>
> On this benchmark I'm seeing about a 24% reduction in "user" CPU time, and a 8% reduction in "system" CPU time. (Almost no reduction in wall-clock time.)

I can help run some logical replication performance benchmarks
tomorrow. Would you mind cleaning the PR and providing the changes
(there are multiple commits in the PR) as a single patch here for the
sake of ease of review and test?

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2023-02-27 13:56:33 Re: SLRUs in the main buffer pool - Page Header definitions
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2023-02-27 13:36:30 Re: SLRUs in the main buffer pool, redux