From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeroen Vermeulen <jtvjtv(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: libpq: PQgetCopyData() and allocation overhead |
Date: | 2023-02-27 13:48:14 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACVaBEbFnBwJ44Uuy7xwr50M+wwTJoEz0C9dFOc=iZeTDw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 5:49 PM Jeroen Vermeulen <jtvjtv(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> OK, I've updated the PR with a benchmark (in the main directory).
>
> On this benchmark I'm seeing about a 24% reduction in "user" CPU time, and a 8% reduction in "system" CPU time. (Almost no reduction in wall-clock time.)
I can help run some logical replication performance benchmarks
tomorrow. Would you mind cleaning the PR and providing the changes
(there are multiple commits in the PR) as a single patch here for the
sake of ease of review and test?
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2023-02-27 13:56:33 | Re: SLRUs in the main buffer pool - Page Header definitions |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2023-02-27 13:36:30 | Re: SLRUs in the main buffer pool, redux |