Re: Use standard SIGHUP and SIGTERM handlers in autoprewarm module

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use standard SIGHUP and SIGTERM handlers in autoprewarm module
Date: 2020-11-13 11:24:28
Message-ID: CALj2ACUmb7DS2ezexRexhSTFAtD8Bm7Z9=-oXucag=c5ZWdxpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:06 AM Fujii Masao
<masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the analysis! I pushed the patch.
>

Thanks! Since we are replacing custom SIGHUP and SIGTERM handlers with
standard ones, how about doing the same thing in worker_spi.c? I
posted a patch previously [1] in this mail thread. If it makes sense,
please review it.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACXDEZhAFOTDcqO9cFSRvrFLyYOnPKrcA1UG4uZn9hUAVg%40mail.gmail.com

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2020-11-13 11:24:40 Re: Detecting File Damage & Inconsistencies
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2020-11-13 11:22:41 Re: Online checksums patch - once again