From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)heterodb(dot)com>, Kazutaka Onishi <onishi(at)heterodb(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: TRUNCATE on foreign table |
Date: | 2021-04-27 06:02:06 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACUh-ijdsBxDGiz3sxzx7bStTdT2skXsDz-o_Zz21wG=eg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:19 AM Fujii Masao
<masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> > In docs v4 patch, I think we can combine below two lines into a single line:
> > + supported by the foreign data wrapper,
> > see <xref linkend="postgres-fdw"/>.
>
> You mean "supported by the foreign data wrapper <xref linkend="postgres-fdw"/>"?
>
> I was thinking that it's better to separate them because postgres_fdw
> is just an example of the foreign data wrapper supporting TRUNCATE.
> This makes me think again; isn't it better to add "for example" or
> "for instance" into after "data wrapper"? That is,
>
> <command>TRUNCATE</command> can be used for foreign tables if
> supported by the foreign data wrapper, for instance,
> see <xref linkend="postgres-fdw"/>.
+1.
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-04-27 06:13:47 | Re: [BUG] "FailedAssertion" reported when streaming in logical replication |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-04-27 05:49:54 | Re: TRUNCATE on foreign table |