Re: Fix stale comment in parallel_vacuum_main().

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix stale comment in parallel_vacuum_main().
Date: 2026-07-29 01:53:00
Message-ID: CALj2ACUXx48m3PC-WHyL+_mkNjDdEQuVcoH_L-0FYNjsigGgcA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 11:24 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I agree with your analysis. And the proposed comment looks clear to
> > me. Will push the patch barring any objections.

Thanks for taking a look at it.

> After reviewing the new comment closely, I think it's better to
> mention the PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND flag too as this is also used
> for autovacuums. I've attached the updated patch, please review it.

Yes, it looks good to me.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2026-07-29 02:35:36 RE: CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER vs. pg_dump, etc.
Previous Message Enrique Sánchez 2026-07-28 23:38:53 Re: Extended statistics improvement: multi-column MCV missing values