From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)heterodb(dot)com>, Kazutaka Onishi <onishi(at)heterodb(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: TRUNCATE on foreign table |
Date: | 2021-04-23 10:56:32 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACUQ+6gsCBQBwfCjmg34JTtLJaEpNWh_+g860278m88AMw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 1:39 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> > + <para>
> > + Note that information about <literal>ONLY</literal> options specified
> > + in the original <command>TRUNCATE</command> command is not passed to
> >
> > I think it is not "information about", no? We just don't pass ONLY
> > option instead we skip it. IMO, we can say "Note that the ONLY option
> > specified with a foreign table in the original TRUNCATE command is
> > skipped and not passed to ExecForeignTruncate."
>
> Probably I still fail to understand your point.
> But if "information about" is confusing, I'm ok to
> remove that. Fixed.
A small typo in the docs patch: It is "are not passed to", instead of
"is not passed to" since we used plural "options". "Note that the ONLY
options specified in the original TRUNCATE command are not passed to"
+ Note that the <literal>ONLY</literal> options specified
in the original <command>TRUNCATE</command> command is not passed to
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-04-23 11:03:56 | Re: decoupling table and index vacuum |
Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2021-04-23 10:45:45 | Re: Iterating on IndexTuple attributes and nbtree page-level dynamic prefix truncation |