Re: Regarding the order of the header file includes

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regarding the order of the header file includes
Date: 2024-03-06 10:25:29
Message-ID: CALj2ACU=RcL4FfKr=TJEeTWD0xz17Pt9aFP_E8SRfFdn47Wa-w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 3:02 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I think we generally follow the rule that we include 'postgres.h' or
> 'postgres_fe.h' first, followed by system header files, and then
> postgres header files ordered in ASCII value. I noticed that in some C
> files we fail to follow this rule strictly. Attached is a patch to fix
> this.
>
> Back in 2019, we performed the same operation in commits 7e735035f2,
> dddf4cdc33, and 14aec03502. It appears that the code has deviated from
> that point onwards.
>
> Please note that this patch only addresses the order of header file
> includes in backend modules (and might not be thorough). It is possible
> that other modules may have a similar issue, but I have not evaluated
> them yet.

+1. I'm just curious to know if you've leveraged any tool from
src/tools/pginclude or any script or such.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2024-03-06 10:26:32 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2024-03-06 10:06:39 Re: Statistics Import and Export