Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

From: Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Xin Zhang <xzhang(at)pivotal(dot)io>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Asim Praveen <apraveen(at)pivotal(dot)io>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication
Date: 2017-11-14 22:28:16
Message-ID: CALfoeitzTK9H-vJSZBenL7JCKMX+1CE+uJiXi+LKDZzxwJFrdQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1297/

Am I missing something or not looking at right place, this is marked as
committed but don't see the change in latest master ?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message legrand legrand 2017-11-14 22:40:56 Re: Transaction control in procedures
Previous Message David Rowley 2017-11-14 22:09:08 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table