Re: Bulk Insert into PostgreSQL

From: Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>
To: craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: skarthikv(dot)iitb(at)gmail(dot)com, don(at)seiler(dot)us, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Bulk Insert into PostgreSQL
Date: 2018-07-04 01:30:26
Message-ID: CALfoeit3Uxzi=3=oqkcohVGSFbu6M5zr+w1jw=csR792kEhWog@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 6:27 AM Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

>
> You can also gain a bit by running with wal_level = minimal. On newer
> version you can use UNLOGGED tables then convert them to logged, but that
> won't be an option for 9.4.
>

Curious to know more on this does with standby also its faster or only
without standby this option can be faster ?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2018-07-04 01:48:39 Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-07-04 01:24:15 Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees