| From: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add mode column to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
| Date: | 2025-08-15 05:46:10 |
| Message-ID: | CALdSSPjnn4Y0iHHeYR45CVjYkev91FiE9ofbJqcdmQymJ5pGiw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 at 09:19, Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
eager".
>
> Unless there’s a strong preference otherwise, I’d like to keep
> “anti-wraparound” and “failsafe” as-is, and keep “normal” (or possibly
> “plain”/“regular” if that reads better).
OK.
I have tested the patch a bit, and noticed that `mode` column shows
`normal` for both auto-vacuum and user-initiated vacuum (via VACUUM
utility statement).
Is it ok? Maybe for more visibility we can display different values
for these two cases?
--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2025-08-15 05:46:18 | RE: Compilation issues for HASH_STATISTICS and HASH_DEBUG options |
| Previous Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2025-08-15 05:45:57 | RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |