Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ...] take 2

From: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ...] take 2
Date: 2025-03-10 13:10:48
Message-ID: CALdSSPjmM1e96BNE04j_kaRVSRk+Hrd_jLKvsns5iyZZTQimkg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 at 18:05, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 07:33, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/4/25 10:24 AM, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> > > Rebased the patch to add support for OLD.* and NEW.*.
> >
> > Apparently the CI did not like that version.
> >
> > Andreas
>
> Hi!
> Applied v6.
>
> 1) Should we answer INSERT 0 10 here?

Sorry, i mean: INSERT 0 0

--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yuki Seino 2025-03-10 13:11:17 Re: Add “FOR UPDATE NOWAIT” lock details to the log.
Previous Message Richard Guo 2025-03-10 13:05:32 Re: Wrong results with subquery pullup and grouping sets