Re: SQL:2011 Application Time Update & Delete

On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 at 21:13, Paul A Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 5:26 AM Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > When applying first two of patches from v67 series, my initdb fails:
> >
> > ```
> > reshke(at)yezzey-cbdb-bench:~/cpg$ ./bin/bin/initdb -D ./db
> > The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "reshke".
> > This user must also own the server process.
> >
> > The database cluster will be initialized with locale "C.UTF-8".
> > The default database encoding has accordingly been set to "UTF8".
> > The default text search configuration will be set to "english".
> >
> > Data page checksums are enabled.
> >
> > creating directory db ... ok
> > creating subdirectories ... ok
> > selecting dynamic shared memory implementation ... posix
> > selecting default "max_connections" ... 100
> > selecting default "shared_buffers" ... 128MB
> > selecting default time zone ... Etc/UTC
> > creating configuration files ... ok
> > running bootstrap script ... ok
> > performing post-bootstrap initialization ... 2026-03-10 12:21:05.842
> > UTC [2995664] WARNING: unrecognized node type: 155
> > 2026-03-10 12:21:05.842 UTC [2995664] FATAL: unrecognized node type: 155
> > 2026-03-10 12:21:05.842 UTC [2995664] STATEMENT: REVOKE ALL ON
> > pg_authid FROM public;
> >
> > child process exited with exit code 1
> > initdb: removing data directory "db"
> > ```
> >
> > without v67-0002 initdb runs ok.
> >
> > Also, after v67-0002 my createdb fails:
> >
> > ```
> > reshke(at)yezzey-cbdb-bench:~/cpg$ ./bin/bin/createdb
> > createdb: error: query failed: ERROR: syntax error at or near "("
> > LINE 1: SELECT pg_catalog.set_config('search_path', '', false);
> > ^
> > createdb: detail: Query was: SELECT
> > pg_catalog.set_config('search_path', '', false);
> > ```
> >
> > Simple queries also fails:
> > ```
> > postgres=# select now();
> > WARNING: unrecognized node type: 144
> > ERROR: unrecognized node type: 76
> > ```
>
> I don't see any of these problems here (after an error-free rebase
> onto a198c26ded), and CI passes. Are you sure that was from a clean
> build? If so, could you share your configure line?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Paul ~{:-)
> pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com

Sorry, It was indeed an issue on my side. It all gone after make
maintainer-clean.
Anyway, I was interested in by-hand testing of 0001 & 0002, which I
did. I tested various partitioned table use-cases, including the new
MERGE PARTITIONS feature, updating the partition column, etc. All
seems to work just fine.

The only review comment I have is that we may need tab-completion
support for UPDATE ... [FOR PARTITION OF] pattern.

--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke