Re: vacuumdb: add --dry-run

From: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuumdb: add --dry-run
Date: 2025-12-05 20:10:36
Message-ID: CALdSSPiqJjVUFjnJFgLQ2u2vhjj37YPHzsiOCRs=asHBm1-OwA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 at 01:08, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> Overall, I can't claim to have super principled arguments about where I've
> added these dry-run messages. I kind-of just sprinkled them around.
>
> --

Yep, sure, just polishing a patch. Let's remove the top-level message, indeed.

--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cary Huang 2025-12-05 20:12:50 Re: Support tid range scan in parallel?
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-12-05 20:08:06 Re: vacuumdb: add --dry-run