| From: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: VM corruption on standby |
| Date: | 2025-08-19 17:07:06 |
| Message-ID: | CALdSSPiaPVTvysVT-7UcQiLP8r9iygy=9cdRAN8Zq1siHWnFKg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 21:16, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
>
> `if (CritSectionCount != 0) _exit(2) else proc_exit(1)` in
> WaitEventSetWaitBlock () solves the issue of inconsistency IF POSTMASTER IS
> SIGKILLED, and doesn't lead to any problem, if postmaster is not SIGKILL-ed
> (since postmaster will SIGKILL its children).
>
This fix was proposed in this thread. It fixes inconsistency but it
replaces one set of problems
with another set, namely systems that fail to shut down.
--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-08-19 17:18:02 | Re: RFC: extensible planner state |
| Previous Message | 章晨曦 | 2025-08-19 17:06:20 | Re: Performance issue on temporary relations |