| From: | Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Anyone using silent_mode? |
| Date: | 2011-07-12 18:08:22 |
| Message-ID: | CALd+dcfG3YN+bytVsM12LxQhvzMJqhimQzpGH7DTJMeJCc7FWg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Is anyone using silent_mode=on ? There's some discussion on pgsql-hackers
> [1] on whether it should be removed altogether in 9.2, since you can get the
> same functionality with "pg_ctl start", or nohup. If you're using
> silent_mode, what are you using it for?
I run with slient_mode=on since all my logging goes to syslog. I don't
need any other output from postgres. I've run this way since 7.1.
I run on FreeBSD so I don't have that OOM killer problem.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | hyelluas | 2011-07-12 18:16:37 | Re: Concurrent read from a partition table. |
| Previous Message | Wim Bertels | 2011-07-12 18:03:47 | psql feature request |