Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments

From: Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments
Date: 2015-02-12 19:44:05
Message-ID: CAL_0b1uy8pHE+iQz=ay6rV4Wc+WUt+AxGbPE4XWj7oa8avcfWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> This obviously should not be the case. I'll have a look in a couple of hours. Until then you can likely just work around the problem by creating the archive_status directory.

Thank you. Just let me know if you need some extra info or debugging.

--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA

http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
+1 (415) 867-9984, +7 (499) 346-7196, +7 (988) 888-1979
gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2015-02-12 20:48:37 gcc5: initdb produces gigabytes of _fsm files
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-02-12 19:40:33 Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments