Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators

From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators
Date: 2020-11-04 09:43:18
Message-ID: CALT9ZEGWzCe4CSFh1BcyZegYmxBLBgM-aUUBNizcdnqHxGTqvw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> > I have only one thing to note: as this patch doesn't disable <^ and >^
> operator for boxes the existing state of documentation seem consistent to
> me:
> >
> > select '((0,0),(1,1))'::box <<| '((0,1),(1,2))'::box;
> > ----------
> > f
> >
> > select '((0,0),(1,1))'::box <^ '((0,1),(1,2))'::box;
> > ----------
> > t
> >
> > So I've only reverted the changes in the documentation on geometric
> functions in your patch.
>
> You are right. We need to keep the documentation for box operators,
> but remove the lines for the point operators.
>

Indeed you are right. PFA v4 with documentation removed for <^ and >^ for
point
Thanks!

--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com>

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Deprecate-and-replace-and-operators-for-points.patch application/octet-stream 25.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-11-04 09:50:04 Re: Some doubious code in pgstat.c
Previous Message Emre Hasegeli 2020-11-04 09:32:19 Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators