Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators

From: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>
To: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators
Date: 2020-11-04 09:32:19
Message-ID: CAE2gYzzu5fozKg_o3Ns0NN2+PrAy3465QJQ18F8giuz2JJcfeA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I've rebased and tested your proposed patch. It seems fine and sensible to me.

Thanks

> I have only one thing to note: as this patch doesn't disable <^ and >^ operator for boxes the existing state of documentation seem consistent to me:
>
> select '((0,0),(1,1))'::box <<| '((0,1),(1,2))'::box;
> ----------
> f
>
> select '((0,0),(1,1))'::box <^ '((0,1),(1,2))'::box;
> ----------
> t
>
> So I've only reverted the changes in the documentation on geometric functions in your patch.

You are right. We need to keep the documentation for box operators,
but remove the lines for the point operators.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Borisov 2020-11-04 09:43:18 Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators
Previous Message Ajin Cherian 2020-11-04 09:31:30 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions