From: | Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators |
Date: | 2020-11-04 09:32:19 |
Message-ID: | CAE2gYzzu5fozKg_o3Ns0NN2+PrAy3465QJQ18F8giuz2JJcfeA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I've rebased and tested your proposed patch. It seems fine and sensible to me.
Thanks
> I have only one thing to note: as this patch doesn't disable <^ and >^ operator for boxes the existing state of documentation seem consistent to me:
>
> select '((0,0),(1,1))'::box <<| '((0,1),(1,2))'::box;
> ----------
> f
>
> select '((0,0),(1,1))'::box <^ '((0,1),(1,2))'::box;
> ----------
> t
>
> So I've only reverted the changes in the documentation on geometric functions in your patch.
You are right. We need to keep the documentation for box operators,
but remove the lines for the point operators.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Borisov | 2020-11-04 09:43:18 | Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators |
Previous Message | Ajin Cherian | 2020-11-04 09:31:30 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |