Re: Is postgres ready for 2038?

From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, 方徳輝 <javaeecoding(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is postgres ready for 2038?
Date: 2020-11-18 15:27:20
Message-ID: CALT9ZEFSr-Wf0Ru9vCy7eOf3K3jcdh3tmzeh1-p+o8ZVdQjbUw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Yes, I agree.

ср, 18 нояб. 2020 г. в 18:44, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:

> Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> Maybe we need to dig a little more to see what's going on here.
>
> > How about just a mention in the future documentation to never ever define
> > _USE_32BIT_TIME_T when compiling PG under Windows? Should be enough, I
> > suppose.
>
> Hmm. Digging around, I see that Mkvcbuild.pm intentionally absorbs
> _USE_32BIT_TIME_T when building with a Perl that defines that.
> I don't know what the state of play is in terms of Windows Perl
> distributions getting off of that, but maybe we should press people
> to not be using such Perl builds.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-11-18 15:49:33 Re: Tab complete for CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER statement
Previous Message Tels 2020-11-18 15:25:44 Re: Tab complete for CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER statement