Re: New isolation test insert-conflict-do-update-4 outputs rows in alternative ordering

From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New isolation test insert-conflict-do-update-4 outputs rows in alternative ordering
Date: 2026-02-25 17:24:54
Message-ID: CALT9ZEEXU-8o2Eb+HPQVnR9B=o+5Oa26xbPJ0s5zMhmFMm9yVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 at 19:52, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > New isolation test insert-conflict-do-update-4 was added by commit 4b760a181ab2
> > Unlike the previous test (insert-conflict-do-update-3) it doesn't
> > contain an ordering clause, and when run on a table with a custom
> > access method, it outputs results in a reverse order.
> > It's a very minor issue, and the proposed fix is just adding the
> > missing ORDER BY clause.
>
> Right, done.
>
> regards, tom lane
Thank you!
Regards,
Pavel Borisov

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2026-02-25 17:38:43 Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Previous Message Zsolt Parragi 2026-02-25 17:16:33 Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)