Re: Problem with moderation of messages with patched attached.

From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with moderation of messages with patched attached.
Date: 2022-03-20 17:02:02
Message-ID: CALT9ZEE5QXa8dOV4uMia4G4D9RgoGo2ddu5Hx2YG_+nOHodd9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> оf course we could get complaints no matter what level we set the limit
> at. I think raising it to 2Mb would be a reasonable experiment. If no
> observable evil ensues then leave it that way. If it does then roll it
> back. I agree that plain uncompressed patches are easier to deal with in
> general.
>
Thanks, Andrew! I think it will be more comfortable now.

Pavel.

>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anton A. Melnikov 2022-03-20 17:09:07 Re: Possible fails in pg_stat_statements test
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-03-20 16:58:31 Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v66