Re: Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent packages #162

From: Eduar Flow <eduarshorybalbuena77(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "M, Anbazhagan" <Anbazhagan(dot)M(at)netapp(dot)com>
Cc: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-pkg-yum(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent packages #162
Date: 2026-03-09 16:44:14
Message-ID: CALR9rdT2_cQ2W5ECt0yn8OeetX+KV8T8chDwNcsHWGRbkddLqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum

Hi Anbazhagan,

This behavior is expected.

The PGDG RPMs for RHEL 8 are typically built against the most recent minor
release available (currently 8.10). Because Red Hat Enterprise Linux
maintains ABI compatibility across RHEL 8 minor versions, packages built on
8.10 remain compatible with earlier minor releases such as 8.9, 8.8, etc.

For that reason, the package naming may include the ".rhel8.10" suffix even
when the RPM is located in repositories corresponding to earlier minor
versions like "rhel-8.9-x86_64".

In short, the suffix reflects the build environment rather than a strict
requirement for that exact minor release.

Best regards

Yekma666

El lun, 9 de mar de 2026, 08:36, M, Anbazhagan <Anbazhagan(dot)M(at)netapp(dot)com>
escribió:

> Hi Devrim,
>
> I was clarified with your response in GitHub issues. This can be closed.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 9, 2026 7:37:15 pm
> *To:* M, Anbazhagan <Anbazhagan(dot)M(at)netapp(dot)com>;
> pgsql-pkg-yum(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
> *Subject:* Re: Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent
> packages #162
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Aready replied you here:
>
> https://github.com/pgdg-packaging/pgdg-rpms/issues/162
>
> On Thu, 2026-03-05 at 04:13 +0000, M, Anbazhagan wrote:
> > We noticed that all newly uploaded packages under the RHEL 8 repos
> > like rhel-8.8/rhel-8.9/rhel-8.10 etc. contain 8.10 in the package
> > name, regardless of the actual minor version of that repo.
> >
> > Could you confirm if this is intentional or if the package should
> > reflect specific RHEL 8 minor version in their names?
> >
> > Example:
> > https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/15/redhat/rhel-8.9-x86_64/
> > contains rpm named as [postgresql15-15.17-1PGDG.rhel8.10.x86_64.rpm]
> >
> > (
> > https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/15/redhat/rhel-8.9-x86_64
> > /postgresql15-15.17-1PGDG.rhel8.10.x86_64.rpm)
> >
> >
> > Anbazhagan M
> > Staff Engineer, Technical Operations
> > Instaclustr by Netapp
> >
> > NetApp
> > +91-8056005329 Mobile Phone
> > anbazhag(at)netapp(dot)com<mailto:anbazhag(at)netapp(dot)com>
> >
> > [NetApp logo]<https://www.netapp.com/>
> >
> > [A white face with black eyes Description automatically
> > generated]<https://netappdiscord.com/>[A black background with a black
> > square Description automatically generated with medium
> > confidence]<https://www.facebook.com/NetApp>[NetApp on
> > Instagram]<https://www.instagram.com/netapp/>[NetApp on
> > LinkedIn]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/netapp/>[NetApp on
> > YouTube]<https://www.youtube.com/netapp>[NetApp on
> > X]<https://twitter.com/NetApp>
>
> --
> Devrim Gündüz
> Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
> BlueSky: @devrim.gunduz.org , @gunduz.org
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim Gündüz 2026-03-10 08:38:26 Re: Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent packages #162
Previous Message M, Anbazhagan 2026-03-09 14:08:23 Re: Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent packages #162