From: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: ResourceOwner refactoring |
Date: | 2021-07-14 15:18:52 |
Message-ID: | CALNJ-vSjN9fsLApo8qxr-NtGGSBkfsHOQV5n4jgEdJwMHgxvEA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 7:40 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> On 14/07/2021 17:07, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2021-Jul-14, vignesh C wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:10 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
> wrote:
> >
> >>> Here you go.
> >>
> >> The patch does not apply on Head anymore, could you rebase and post a
> >> patch. I'm changing the status to "Waiting for Author".
> >
> > Support for hmac was added by e6bdfd9700eb so the rebase is not trivial.
>
> Yeah, needed some manual fixing, but here you go.
>
> - Heikki
>
Hi,
For the loop over the hash:
+ for (int idx = 0; idx < capacity; idx++)
{
- if (olditemsarr[i] != resarr->invalidval)
- ResourceArrayAdd(resarr, olditemsarr[i]);
+ while (owner->hash[idx].kind != NULL &&
+ owner->hash[idx].kind->phase == phase)
...
+ } while (capacity != owner->capacity);
Since the phase variable doesn't seem to change for the while loop, I
wonder what benefit the while loop has (since the release is governed by
phase).
Cheers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-07-14 15:21:35 | Re: Avoid repeated PQfnumber() in pg_dump |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-07-14 15:13:16 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |