| From: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | dummy relation in partitionwise join |
| Date: | 2021-10-28 15:44:50 |
| Message-ID: | CALNJ-vRfjm0FD2=NhB9BDgk1S3FAkQ1DEbdcPjMy-KwPB0PqYA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I was looking at:
commit 475dbd0b718de8ac44da144f934651b959e3b705
Author: David Rowley <drowley(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Date: Tue Aug 3 11:47:24 2021 +1200
Track a Bitmapset of non-pruned partitions in RelOptInfo
I noticed that the dummy relation is skipped in the loop
over rel->live_parts.
I wonder if the following change is sensible.
Thanks
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| skip-adding-dummy.patch | application/octet-stream | 730 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gilles Darold | 2021-10-28 15:55:24 | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-10-28 15:39:52 | ThisTimeLineID is used uninitialized in basebackup.c, too |