Re: Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage

From: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "Andrey V(dot) Lepikhov" <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage
Date: 2022-04-10 13:46:25
Message-ID: CALNJ-vRF1fw9dh-2sZW9bETqwcttOMw4ptLp6sOrzVUSw=Ycvw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 3:42 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 1:58 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 9:43 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > > This patch seems to be causing the planner to crash.
> > > Here's a query reduced from sqlsmith.
> > >
> > > | explain SELECT 1 FROM information_schema.constraint_column_usage
> WHERE 1 <= pg_trigger_depth();
> > >
> > > Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> >
> > Reproduced. Will look into this.
>
> I think the cause of this is that mark_async_capable_plan() failed to
> take into account that when the given path is a SubqueryScanPath or
> ForeignPath, the given corresponding plan might include a gating
> Result node that evaluates pseudoconstant quals. My oversight. :-(
> Attached is a patch for fixing that. I think v14 has the same issue,
> so I think we need backpatching.
>
> Best regards,
> Etsuro Fujita
>
Hi,
Looking at the second hunk of the patch:
FdwRoutine *fdwroutine = path->parent->fdwroutine;
...
+ if (IsA(plan, Result))
+ return false;

It seems the check of whether plan is a Result node can be lifted ahead of
the switch statement (i.e. to the beginning of mark_async_capable_plan).

This way, we don't have to check for every case in the switch statement.

Cheers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-04-10 16:43:30 Re: Can we automatically add elapsed times to tap test log?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-04-10 13:23:16 Re: Can we automatically add elapsed times to tap test log?