Re: [PATCH] refactor ATExec{En,Dis}ableRowSecurity

From: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] refactor ATExec{En,Dis}ableRowSecurity
Date: 2021-02-28 22:27:44
Message-ID: CALNJ-vQS=fMYjp1ncwPfjZgdhmbyzaD+gaEQGxmb0rLGFH-6vA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,
For 0002-Further-refactoring.patch, should there be assertion
inside ATExecSetRowSecurity() on the values for rls and force_rls ?
There could be 3 possible values: -1, 0 and 1.

Cheers

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 1:19 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:

> tablecmds.c is 17k lines long, this makes it ~30 lines shorter.
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-02-28 22:30:24 Re: Remove latch.c workaround for Linux < 2.6.27
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-02-28 22:25:30 alter table set TABLE ACCESS METHOD