Re: Redundant Unique plan node for table with a unique index

From:	Damir Belyalov <dam(dot)bel07(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
Subject:	Re: Redundant Unique plan node for table with a unique index
Date:	2023-09-14 08:44:08
Message-ID:	CALH1LgvtuOrtTyWd1dJS=TSgwdugZ7KzSoqn8yaAUHQBSoogKg@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2023-09-13 13:22:00 from Damir Belyalov <dam(dot)bel07(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎  2023-09-13 13:28:18 from Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>  2023-09-13 23:39:05 from David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>   2023-09-14 01:17:58 from Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>    2023-09-14 08:44:08 from Damir Belyalov <dam(dot)bel07(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: Redundant Unique plan node for table with a unique index at 2023-09-14 01:17:58 from Andy Fan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Daniel Gustafsson	2023-09-14 08:48:45	Re: Reducing connection overhead in pg_upgrade compat check phase
Previous Message	Junwang Zhao	2023-09-14 08:28:26	Re: [dynahash] do not refill the hashkey after hash_search