Re: Can we remove extra memset in BloomInitPage, GinInitPage and SpGistInitPage when we have it in PageInit?

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can we remove extra memset in BloomInitPage, GinInitPage and SpGistInitPage when we have it in PageInit?
Date: 2021-04-03 09:39:06
Message-ID: CALDaNm3Z2bOf=MQrUvDdd=XiSzYFu2=EHou+MR3h8SYj0Jy79w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:16 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are memset-ting the special space page that's already set to zeros
> by PageInit in BloomInitPage, GinInitPage and SpGistInitPage. We have
> already removed the memset after PageInit in gistinitpage (see the
> comment there). Unless I'm missing something, IMO they are redundant.
> I'm attaching a small patch that gets rid of the extra memset calls.
>
> While on it, I removed MAXALIGN(sizeof(SpGistPageOpaqueData)) in
> SpGistInitPage because the PageInit will anyways align the
> specialSize. This change is inline with other places (such as
> BloomInitPage, brin_page_init GinInitPage, gistinitpage,
> _hash_pageinit and so on) where we just pass the size of special space
> data structure.
>
> I didn't see any regression test failure on my dev system with the
> attached patch.
>
> Thoughts?

The changes look fine to me.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2021-04-03 09:54:56 Re: [PATCH] Implement motd for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2021-04-03 08:14:21 Re: [PATCH] Implement motd for PostgreSQL