| From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Date: | 2021-08-03 10:02:38 |
| Message-ID: | CALDaNm3Yzx3OtzD5J0PHRqhEPC6ty8iVZJ8qquFyTSx8=uGhCA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:32 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 6:17 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Please find attached the latest patch set v102*
> >
>
> I have made minor modifications in the comments and docs, please see
> attached. Can you please check whether the names of contributors in
> the commit message are correct or do we need to change it?
The patch applies neatly, the tests pass and documentation built with
the updates provided. I could not find any comments. The patch looks
good to me.
Regards,
Vignesh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | r.takahashi_2@fujitsu.com | 2021-08-03 10:15:42 | RE: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance |
| Previous Message | Gilles Darold | 2021-08-03 09:45:09 | Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace |