| From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Date: | 2025-12-20 09:47:11 |
| Message-ID: | CALDaNm3USsXVNBsfdpkp60HVgrTV4taWMk1xZYNBa7QUF=V0jg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 at 09:54, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 at 21:17, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 3:51 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 3:04 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 7:49 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I was considering the interdependence between the subscription and the
> > > > > conflict log table (CLT). IMHO, it would be logical to establish the
> > > > > subscription as dependent on the CLT. This way, if someone attempts to
> > > > > drop the CLT, the system would recognize the dependency of the
> > > > > subscription and prevent the drop unless the subscription is removed
> > > > > first or the CASCADE option is used.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, while investigating this, I encountered an error [1] stating
> > > > > that global objects are not supported in this context. This indicates
> > > > > that global objects cannot be made dependent on local objects.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > What we need here is an equivalent of DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL for database
> > > > objects. For example, consider following case:
> > > > postgres=# create table t1(c1 int primary key);
> > > > CREATE TABLE
> > > > postgres=# \d+ t1
> > > > Table "public.t1"
> > > > Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default | Storage |
> > > > Compression | Stats target | Description
> > > > --------+---------+-----------+----------+---------+---------+-------------+--------------+-------------
> > > > c1 | integer | | not null | | plain |
> > > > | |
> > > > Indexes:
> > > > "t1_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (c1)
> > > > Publications:
> > > > "pub1"
> > > > Not-null constraints:
> > > > "t1_c1_not_null" NOT NULL "c1"
> > > > Access method: heap
> > > > postgres=# drop index t1_pkey;
> > > > ERROR: cannot drop index t1_pkey because constraint t1_pkey on table
> > > > t1 requires it
> > > > HINT: You can drop constraint t1_pkey on table t1 instead.
> > > >
> > > > Here, the PK index is created as part for CREATE TABLE operation and
> > > > pk_index is not allowed to be dropped independently.
> > > >
> > > > > Although making an object dependent on global/shared objects is
> > > > > possible for certain types of shared objects [2], this is not our main
> > > > > objective.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > As per my understanding from the above example, we need something like
> > > > that only for shared object subscription and (internally created)
> > > > table.
> > >
> > > Yeah that seems to be exactly what we want, so I tried doing that by
> > > recording DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL dependency of CLT on subscription[1] and
> > > it is behaving as we want[2]. And while dropping the subscription or
> > > altering CLT we can delete internal dependency so that CLT get dropped
> > > automatically[3]
> > >
> > > I will send an updated patch after testing a few more scenarios and
> > > fixing other pending issues.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > + ObjectAddressSet(myself, RelationRelationId, relid);
> > > + ObjectAddressSet(subaddr, SubscriptionRelationId, subid);
> > > + recordDependencyOn(&myself, &subaddr, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL);
> > >
> > >
> > > [2]
> > > postgres[670778]=# DROP TABLE myschema.conflict_log_history2;
> > > ERROR: 2BP01: cannot drop table myschema.conflict_log_history2
> > > because subscription sub requires it
> > > HINT: You can drop subscription sub instead.
> > > LOCATION: findDependentObjects, dependency.c:788
> > > postgres[670778]=#
> > >
> > > [3]
> > > ObjectAddressSet(object, SubscriptionRelationId, subid);
> > > performDeletion(&object, DROP_CASCADE
> > > PERFORM_DELETION_INTERNAL |
> > > PERFORM_DELETION_SKIP_ORIGINAL);
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Here is the patch which implements the dependency and fixes other
> > comments from Shveta.
>
> Thanks for the changes, the new implementation based on dependency
> creates a cycle while dumping:
> ./pg_dump -d postgres -f dump1.txt -p 5433
> pg_dump: warning: could not resolve dependency loop among these items:
> pg_dump: detail: TABLE conflict (ID 225 OID 16397)
> pg_dump: detail: SUBSCRIPTION (ID 3484 OID 16396)
> pg_dump: detail: POST-DATA BOUNDARY (ID 3491)
> pg_dump: detail: TABLE DATA t1 (ID 3485 OID 16384)
> pg_dump: detail: PRE-DATA BOUNDARY (ID 3490)
>
> This can be seen with a simple subscription with conflict_log_table.
> This was working fine with the v11 version patch.
The attached v13 patch includes the fix for this issue. In addition,
it now raises an error when attempting to configure a conflict log
table that belongs to a temporary schema or is not a permanent
(persistent) relation.
Regards,
Vignesh
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v13-0001-Add-configurable-conflict-log-table-for-Logical-.patch | text/x-patch | 126.0 KB |
| v13-0002-pg_dump-dump-conflict-log-table-configuration-fo.patch | text/x-patch | 18.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kirill Reshke | 2025-12-20 10:32:34 | Re: Additional message in pg_terminate_backend |
| Previous Message | Roman Khapov | 2025-12-20 09:26:40 | Re: Additional message in pg_terminate_backend |