Re: Logical Replication of sequences

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Date: 2025-11-10 10:52:15
Message-ID: CALDaNm3G5LYNhGGQC8rM-wwnA0nk21j13Jkr4LkHFTSk0rcEQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 at 14:34, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> While working on another thread, I found that in HEAD gram.y has
> grammar which was committed as part of this thread:
> ```
> | CREATE PUBLICATION name FOR pub_obj_type_list opt_definition
> {
> CreatePublicationStmt *n = makeNode(CreatePublicationStmt);
>
> n->pubname = $3;
> n->pubobjects = (List *) $5;
> preprocess_pub_all_objtype_list($5, &n->for_all_tables,
> &n->for_all_sequences,
> yyscanner);
> n->options = $6;
> $$ = (Node *) n;
> }
> ```
>
> Here we are assigning "n->pubobjects = (List *) $5". But later in the
> code this is not used anywhere for ALL TABLES/ ALL SEQUENCES
> publication. It is used for other publications (not ALL TABLES/
> SEQUENCES) inside function "ObjectsInPublicationToOids"
>
> So are we required to assign "n->pubobjects" here?
>
> I have created a patch to remove this assignment. It passed "make check-world".

I agree that this is not required for ALL TABLES/ALL SEQUENCES cases.
Your changes look good to me.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message zengman 2025-11-10 11:04:41 Minor adjustment: Update the range of the commit_siblings parameter.
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-11-10 10:44:27 Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance