| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
| Date: | 2025-11-11 03:32:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KcTpgCDNkrD5YE1hh8O+Y-u2a4ds9aahHnxLKjBivGHQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 4:22 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 at 14:34, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > While working on another thread, I found that in HEAD gram.y has
> > grammar which was committed as part of this thread:
> > ```
> > | CREATE PUBLICATION name FOR pub_obj_type_list opt_definition
> > {
> > CreatePublicationStmt *n = makeNode(CreatePublicationStmt);
> >
> > n->pubname = $3;
> > n->pubobjects = (List *) $5;
> > preprocess_pub_all_objtype_list($5, &n->for_all_tables,
> > &n->for_all_sequences,
> > yyscanner);
> > n->options = $6;
> > $$ = (Node *) n;
> > }
> > ```
> >
> > Here we are assigning "n->pubobjects = (List *) $5". But later in the
> > code this is not used anywhere for ALL TABLES/ ALL SEQUENCES
> > publication. It is used for other publications (not ALL TABLES/
> > SEQUENCES) inside function "ObjectsInPublicationToOids"
> >
> > So are we required to assign "n->pubobjects" here?
> >
> > I have created a patch to remove this assignment. It passed "make check-world".
>
> I agree that this is not required for ALL TABLES/ALL SEQUENCES cases.
>
I also agree. BTW, can we change pub_obj_type_list to
pub_all_obj_type_list to be more explicit about this variant? If you
agree then we can make similar changes
(pub_obj_type->pub_all_obj_type) at the following places as well:
+ * CREATE PUBLICATION FOR ALL pub_obj_type [, ...] [WITH options]
+ *
+ * pub_obj_type is one of:
+ *
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2025-11-11 03:36:32 | RE: Newly created replication slot may be invalidated by checkpoint |
| Previous Message | Chao Li | 2025-11-11 03:32:27 | Is this a typo? |