| From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication |
| Date: | 2021-12-08 06:00:27 |
| Message-ID: | CALDaNm3BBSMZ24wS3Sm1KdPcGRjxgyYMNpnUKfvOZZBtof=uEw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:11 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 5:53 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 11:24 AM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> > <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > 2) Any particular reason why the code and tests are backbranched but
> > not the document changes?
> >
>
> I am not sure whether we need the doc change or not as this is not a
> new feature and even if we need it as an improvement to docs, shall we
> consider backpatching it? I felt that code changes are required to fix
> a known issue so the case of backpatching it is clear.
Thanks for the clarification, I got your point. I'm fine either way
regarding the documentation change. The rest of the patch looks good
to me.
Regards,
Vignesh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2021-12-08 06:03:37 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-12-08 05:41:45 | Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication |