Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Date: 2021-11-29 06:07:50
Message-ID: CALDaNm2_WY2t2GnzW1-QL823+xk5cuC0zc4Eep8fjYeLB0jfRA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:13 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:12 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 7:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Thank you for updating the patch!
> >
> > > I have made a number of changes in the attached patch which includes
> > > (a) the patch was trying to register multiple array entries for the
> > > same subscription which doesn't seem to be required, see changes in
> > > pgstat_vacuum_stat, (b) multiple changes in the test like reduced the
> > > wal_retrieve_retry_interval to 2s which has reduced the test time to
> > > half, remove the check related to resetting of stats as there is no
> > > guarantee that the message will be received by the collector and we
> > > were not sending it again, changed the test case file name to
> > > 026_stats as we can add more subscription-related stats in this test
> > > file itself
> >
> > Since we have pg_stat_subscription view, how about 026_worker_stats.pl?
> >
>
> Sounds better. Updated patch attached.

Thanks for the updated patch, the v28 patch looks good to me.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-11-29 06:18:50 Re: Rationalizing declarations of src/common/ variables
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2021-11-29 06:02:44 Re: Add connection active, idle time to pg_stat_activity