Re: Documentation to upgrade logical replication cluster

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Documentation to upgrade logical replication cluster
Date: 2024-02-13 03:19:25
Message-ID: CALDaNm2VuOeAYqyT9sgv=RbRUDFm5gVbo-zz511-KaNLOVWjZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 14:33, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 12:30, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Here are some review comments for patch v7-0001.
> >
> > ======
> > doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml
> >
> > 1.
> > + <glossentry id="glossary-logical-replication-cluster">
> > + <glossterm>Logical replication cluster</glossterm>
> > + <glossdef>
> > + <para>
> > + A set of publisher and subscriber instance with publisher instance
> > + replicating changes to the subscriber instance.
> > + </para>
> > + </glossdef>
> > + </glossentry>
> >
> > 1a.
> > /instance with/instances with/
>
> Modified
>
> > ~~~
> >
> > 1b.
> > The description then made me want to look up the glossary definition
> > of a "publisher instance" and "subscriber instance", but then I was
> > quite surprised that even "Publisher" and "Subscriber" terms are not
> > described in the glossary. Should this patch add those, or should we
> > start another thread for adding them?
>
> I felt it is better to start a new thread for this

A new patch has been posted at [1] to address this.
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANhcyEXa%3D%2BshzbdS2iW9%3DY%3D_Eh7aRWZbQKJjDHVYiCmuiE1Okw%40mail.gmail.com

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2024-02-13 03:38:39 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Previous Message torikoshia 2024-02-13 02:30:53 Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query