Re: Logical replication row filter loses unchanged toasted columns

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Logical replication row filter loses unchanged toasted columns
Date: 2026-09-07 15:42:42
Message-ID: CALDaNm24+gk7vv_McmX9cw8P+5kCfQdMNERTC0up_Zn53Vs6_Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2 Sept 2026 at 16:02, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Agreed. Let's start a separate thread for this case.

I have started a new thread for this issue at [1].
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CALDaNm2-UtYX%2BpFQMEn44bpgZwYX9F9kV2Q4%2BHnC0TWp-Nx3ig%40mail.gmail.com

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florin Irion 2026-09-07 15:55:29 Re: pg_upgrade_replica: avoid full re-clone of standbys after pg_upgrade
Previous Message vignesh C 2026-09-07 15:34:39 Re: Logical replication can lose an update after concurrent index invalidation