Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Date: 2022-05-20 09:45:42
Message-ID: CALDaNm20AnzZSneb43QFAU2GHGm2ezwfbNCznKkGhCesd+yNSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 1:40 PM shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2022 2:47 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the comments, the attached v13 patch has the changes for the same.
> >
>
> Thanks for your patch. Here are some comments on v13-0001 patch.
>
> 1)
> @@ -152,6 +152,18 @@ CREATE SUBSCRIPTION <replaceable class="parameter">subscription_name</replaceabl
> </listitem>
> </varlistentry>
>
> + <varlistentry>
> + <term><literal>local_only</literal> (<type>boolean</type>)</term>
> + <listitem>
> + <para>
> + Specifies whether the subscription will request the publisher to send
> + locally originated changes at the publisher node, or send any
> + publisher node changes regardless of their origin. The default is
> + <literal>false</literal>.
> + </para>
> + </listitem>
> + </varlistentry>
> +
> <varlistentry>
> <term><literal>slot_name</literal> (<type>string</type>)</term>
> <listitem>
>
> I think this change should be put after "The following parameters control the
> subscription's replication behavior after it has been created", thoughts?

Modified

> 2)
> A new column "sublocalonly" is added to pg_subscription, so maybe we need add it
> to pg_subscription document, too. (in doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml)

Modified

> 3)
> /*
> * Currently we always forward.
> */
> static bool
> pgoutput_origin_filter(LogicalDecodingContext *ctx,
> RepOriginId origin_id)
>
> Should we modify the comment of pgoutput_origin_filter()? It doesn't match the
> code.

Modified

Thanks for the comments, the v14 patch attached at [1] has the changes
for the same.
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm0xuYy35vOudVHBjov3fQ%3DjBRHJHKUUN9VarqO%3DYqtaxg%40mail.gmail.com

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2022-05-20 10:00:54 Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Previous Message vignesh C 2022-05-20 09:37:47 Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup