| From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi |
| Subject: | Re: WAL record CRC calculated incorrectly because of underlying buffer modification |
| Date: | 2026-11-02 13:25:49 |
| Message-ID: | CALDaNm1q0XRVMRNyB_zdNw13W7yQ_pdQ+jqQUyqnY=SCANZfuA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2 Nov 2026 at 16:31, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 02:21:58PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > I was wondering whether we should mention this in the release notes,
> > advising users to update standbys before primaries or disable
> > wal_consistency_checking on the primary until all nodes are updated.
>
> wal_consistency_checking is a developer option. I doubt that this is
> worth mentioning in the release notes: nobody should use it in
> production environments.
Thanks, that makes sense. Then nothing else is required for this.
Regards,
Vignesh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2026-11-02 13:33:25 | Re: Let's drop support for named POSIX semaphores |
| Previous Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2026-11-02 13:10:52 | Re: issues with eager aggregation |