Re: [PATCH]Comment improvement in publication.sql

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Comment improvement in publication.sql
Date: 2021-12-08 04:49:25
Message-ID: CALDaNm1YU=1wdjCaS1xv8QWTPe00+9v5+Hgfgtfx3hH89Ed0SQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 4:26 PM tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, August 8, 2021 6:34 PM, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote
> >Thanks for the updated patch, your changes look good to me. You might
> >want to include the commit message in the patch, that will be useful.
>
> Thanks for your kindly suggestion.
> Updated patch attached. Added the patch commit message with no new fix.

The patch no longer applies, could you post a rebased patch.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-12-08 05:15:48 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-12-08 04:41:59 Re: Is it correct to update db state in control file as "shutting down" during end-of-recovery checkpoint?