Re: Review items for EXCEPT TABLE publication

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review items for EXCEPT TABLE publication
Date: 2026-09-11 11:59:41
Message-ID: CALDaNm0dGEeuTym=UQC6OF3ShH-dQbLkFoT2HJtGSnfCD8zARw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 11 Sept 2026 at 16:36, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I am fine with the single message but how about changing the HINT to:
> "Drop the table from the publication, or remove it from the
> publication's EXCEPT clause, first." because the proposed message is
> not suitable for the EXCEPT case.

Here is an updated v5 version to handle the suggested change.

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Prevent-unlogged-tables-in-publication-EXCEPT-cla.patch application/octet-stream 6.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2026-09-11 12:02:37 Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) can crash a logical decoding session
Previous Message Ilia Evdokimov 2026-09-11 11:52:42 Re: Fold NOT IN / <> ALL expressions containing NULL to FALSE