Re: Parallel copy

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel copy
Date: 2020-10-27 15:23:39
Message-ID: CALDaNm0NR8Z74LNB+Jw3R046Rnm1F8zq96fD60nvt2ASeBwTJA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 4:20 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:18 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > 17. Remove extra lines after #define IsHeaderLine()
> > (cstate->header_line && cstate->cur_lineno == 1) in copy.h
> >
>
> I missed one comment:
>
> 18. I think we need to treat the number of parallel workers as an
> integer similar to the parallel option in vacuum.
>
> postgres=# copy t1 from stdin with(parallel '1'); <<<<< - we
> should not allow this.
> Enter data to be copied followed by a newline.
>
> postgres=# vacuum (parallel '1') t1;
> ERROR: parallel requires an integer value
>

I have made the behavior the same as vacuum.
This is addressed in v9 patch shared at [1].
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1cAONkFDN6K72DSiRpgqNGvwxQL7TjEiHZ58opnp9VoA@mail.gmail.com

Regards,
Vignesh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2020-10-27 15:26:41 Re: Parallel copy
Previous Message vignesh C 2020-10-27 15:22:07 Re: Parallel copy