Re: [PATCH] Expand character set for ltree labels

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Garen Torikian <gjtorikian(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expand character set for ltree labels
Date: 2023-01-06 06:00:22
Message-ID: CALDaNm0-KyGQfP7sv9U9o4momFH595GhLC1n+4f7Cqot4ewb5A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 00:27, Garen Torikian <gjtorikian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Sure. Rebased onto HEAD.
>

There is one more merge conflict, please post a rebased patch:
=== Applying patches on top of PostgreSQL commit ID
eb5ad4ff05fd382ac98cab60b82f7fd6ce4cfeb8 ===
=== applying patch ./0003-Expand-character-set-for-ltree-labels.patch
patching file contrib/ltree/expected/ltree.out
Hunk #1 succeeded at 25 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 51.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 537.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1201 with fuzz 2.
2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
contrib/ltree/expected/ltree.out.rej

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2023-01-06 06:03:49 Re: Force streaming every change in logical decoding
Previous Message vignesh C 2023-01-06 05:54:47 Re: Add a new pg_walinspect function to extract FPIs from WAL records