Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option
Date: 2018-11-01 11:28:11
Message-ID: CALAY4q9vAe5QmCkr6z+dT75sGQTpKAG7-Vu9DoBD_WUEjGpELw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

hi,

The attached patch include all the comment given by Tomas and i check sql
standard about LIMIT and this feature

it did not say anything about it but I think its good idea to include it to
LIMIT too and I will add it if we have consensus on it.

regards

surafel

Attachment Content-Type Size
fetch_first_with_ties_v2.patch text/x-patch 28.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2018-11-01 11:34:14 Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-11-01 11:14:40 Re: More issues with pg_verify_checksums and checksum verification in base backups