| From: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option |
| Date: | 2018-11-01 11:28:11 |
| Message-ID: | CALAY4q9vAe5QmCkr6z+dT75sGQTpKAG7-Vu9DoBD_WUEjGpELw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
hi,
The attached patch include all the comment given by Tomas and i check sql
standard about LIMIT and this feature
it did not say anything about it but I think its good idea to include it to
LIMIT too and I will add it if we have consensus on it.
regards
surafel
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fetch_first_with_ties_v2.patch | text/x-patch | 28.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2018-11-01 11:34:14 | Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof? |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-11-01 11:14:40 | Re: More issues with pg_verify_checksums and checksum verification in base backups |