Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option
Date: 2019-02-04 10:37:39
Message-ID: CALAY4q8vDyK4_jhFkXyWnJRcuWGgkwOzJTw-j2Dw0ddyTiZM4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:29 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

>
> This patch needs a rebase because of conflicts done recently for
> pluggable storage, so moved to next CF, waiting on author.
> --
>

Thank you . rebased against current master

regards
Surafel

Attachment Content-Type Size
fetch_first_with_ties_v6.patch text/x-patch 28.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2019-02-04 10:54:49 Tighten up a few overly lax regexes in pg_dump's tap tests
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-02-04 10:13:35 Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes